Forums / 作ってもらいたいパーツ Wish List / s13/s14 subframe conversion bushings

Parts Shop MAX :: Forums :: MAXに質問　Ask MAX :: 作ってもらいたいパーツ Wish List
s13/s14 subframe conversion bushings	<< Previous thread \| Next thread >>

Go to page <<
Moderators: Parts Shop Max, Dan at MAX USA

Author

Post

Hollywood

Wed Jun 20 2012, 03:12AM

Registered Member #708

Joined: Sun Feb 28 2010, 07:22PM

Posts: 653

kaspar just dont reply you make no sence. why would you run s14 front lower control arms on the rear.. your killing me bro!! just stop already..

Dan at MAX USA

Wed Jun 20 2012, 06:58PM

Registered Member #2

Joined: Sun Jan 21 2007, 08:28PM

Posts: 2866

the side spacing of S13 and S14 RLCA's subframe mount bushings are different

NismoPlsr

Wed Jun 20 2012, 07:28PM

Registered Member #988

Joined: Fri Feb 25 2011, 12:51PM

Posts: 16

Hollywood wrote ...

dude you make no sence what so ever... either way im sure dan will pipe in, we have all ben over it and found the correction in geometry with the subframe risers and the addition to the modded knucles give you much better geometry without increasing track in the rear. s13's are notorious for under stear as it is. widening the rear would only make that worse, regardless of geometry.

ps you want squat, weight transfer creates traction and more traction = more controle.

I am talking about "anti-squat" in suspension design (it's a valid term to describe a property of the geometry), not whether the car actually squats. The point of swapping to s14 subframe is the inherent lesser % of anti-squat.

[ Edited Wed Jun 20 2012, 07:29PM ]

NismoPlsr

Wed Jun 20 2012, 07:31PM

Registered Member #988

Joined: Fri Feb 25 2011, 12:51PM

Posts: 16

Hollywood wrote ...

kaspar just dont reply you make no sence. why would you run s14 front lower control arms on the rear.. your killing me bro!! just stop already..

He is talking about gaining more track width in the front to compensate for the small difference in the rear.

o.g.darkdrifter

Fri Jun 22 2012, 04:50AM

Registered Member #580

Joined: Mon Jul 13 2009, 06:02PM

Posts: 155

I think what Dan and Hollywood are trying to say is that it will be more cost effective and provide better performance to simply run the subframe risers and play with rear springs than to have to deal with swapping subframes between the two chassis, and thus developing something to assist in doing so would be a waste of their time.

Dan at MAX USA

Sat Jun 23 2012, 12:12AM

Registered Member #2

Joined: Sun Jan 21 2007, 08:28PM

Posts: 2866

I would not go so far to say its a waste of time,

I mean there are companies that make it already, so the need can be met already, and I understand that when people ask us to do it, its just because they prefer buying from MAX so I really do appreciate that factor. Its just that since we know there are other suppliers, and its not a high volume part, its not top priority to get this made.

kaspar

Mon Jun 25 2012, 01:46AM

Registered Member #782

Joined: Sat Jun 26 2010, 11:34AM

Posts: 14

NismoPlsr wrote ...

Hollywood wrote ...

kaspar just dont reply you make no sence. why would you run s14 front lower control arms on the rear.. your killing me bro!! just stop already..

He is talking about gaining more track width in the front to compensate for the small difference in the rear.

bingo!!!!!!!!!!!!! realistically,i did it cuz i got rid of my rotted to high hell s14,and just threw the shit in the s13....i dont have much s13 left at this point anyways

Go to page <<
Jump: Back to top